Identity and privileged access
Protect high-impact accounts, administrative paths and identity recovery mechanisms.
We connect governance, architecture, offensive testing and recovery for organizations where outage, identity compromise or data loss can directly affect citizens and public mission.
Exposure does not stop at the perimeter. Identity, suppliers, interconnections, endpoints, cloud and backup may form a single attack path.
Protect high-impact accounts, administrative paths and identity recovery mechanisms.
Map dependencies and trust relationships across platforms, organizations and third parties.
Connect data protection to application restoration and continuity of citizen services.
Every engagement creates a common view for leadership, security, infrastructure, application and supplier teams.
Risk, maturity, zero-trust, segmentation, identity, cloud and a transformation roadmap.
Test exploitable paths under rules adapted to sensitive systems and active services.
Runbooks, exercises, protected backup and clean restoration after a destructive attack.
We avoid assessments treating every asset equally. We begin with mission impact and trace the technology, people and suppliers supporting the service.
Essential services, users, data, critical periods and outage tolerance.
Identity, applications, networks, cloud, suppliers, backup and single points of failure.
Evidence, configuration, offensive testing and exercises appropriate to sensitivity.
Ownership, roadmap, architecture, runbooks and knowledge transfer.
Documentation must work in operations, management and supplier relationships without exposing sensitive information unnecessarily.
Exposure and consequence organized around mission, not merely technical inventory.
Principles, trust zones, identity, telemetry, backup and acceptance criteria.
Priorities, owners, dependencies and evidence required for closure.
Validate response and recovery against credible public-service situations.
Scope and collaboration are adapted to system criticality, accountability and access boundaries.
Yes, with carefully defined scope, boundaries, windows, monitoring and stop conditions. For functions with minimal risk tolerance, phased validation or representative environments may be more appropriate.
Authorized people, channels, access, evidence retention and detail levels are agreed in advance. Sensitive information is not requested through initial contact.
Yes. Complex infrastructure depends on service owners, IT, security and suppliers working together. We clarify responsibility and acceptance criteria for each party.
We can assess and improve relevant governance, security processes and technical controls for NIS2 readiness. Exact legal applicability and obligations should be confirmed with authorized specialists.
Yes. A well-chosen pilot can validate the method, expose shared dependencies and produce a repeatable model without starting with an excessively broad program.
Tell us what needs to be protected, tested or recovered. The first conversation is confidential, direct and free of product pitches.
Choose the need, provide essential context and your request goes directly to the senior team.
Do not include passwords, sensitive logs or incident details in your first email. We will establish a secure channel together.